Author: Sally Weltrop
Date: 20:43:00 12/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2002 at 19:13:12, Bob Durrett wrote: >On December 19, 2002 at 18:18:43, bobby palacios wrote: > >>On December 19, 2002 at 17:58:15, Bob Durrett wrote: >> >>> >>>1 Ghz Pentium 1 GB RAM single processor >>> >>>Fritz 8: >>> >>>Hash: 256 >>> >>>Kn/s < 400 middlegame >>> >>>Was close to 500 in Fritz 7. Was even higher in 5.32. >>> >>>What is wrong? >>> >>>It'll take forever to get to any reasonable search depth. >>> >>>Is the position evaluation all that much better? >>> >>>Bob D. >> >>on my p4 2.4ghz: >> >>Fritz 5.32 1,500 - 1,600 k/ns >>Fritz 7 940 - 950 k/ns >> >>even though, Fritz 5 has a higher nps count, it usually searches 1 ply or so >>less. And Fritz 7 or even 8 has a lot more knowledge. > >When going from Fritz 5.32 to 6.0, I noticed a decrease in the ply depth for the >same analysis time. > >My Fritz 8 arrived just a few hours ago. In a few days, I'll know about the ply >depth. But, maybe that isn't a good indicator of analysis quality either? this is true, look at HIARCS and its nps. tops I see on my 950TBird is 120Knps > >Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.