Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why CSTal

Author: Moritz Berger

Date: 15:23:37 09/19/98

Go up one level in this thread


On September 19, 1998 at 13:47:22, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>Cstal is not designed to make money.
>If so we would have released at least 1 version each christmas, and at least one
>version each summer.
>But chris doesn't.
>
>CSTal does not costs 200 DM. it costs less.
>
>it is made to come in contact with all kind of nice guys, like you e.g.
>to exchange ideas about chess, talk about games, to have fun with chess.
>
>It is NOT, again, NOT made to make money.
>
>Version 284 was on the server.
>Than ersion 289 was put on the server. Moritz, Dirk and Harald Faber complained
>in rgcc that this version 289 consisted of 2 versions (cstwhite/cstblack).

FACT: I did NOT complain in r.g.c.c. that it was 2 versions.

>I don't understand this complaint, because it was for free.

Certainly this complaint was for free. Sad that it only exists in your
imagination.

>IMO if a company gives something for the customer, the customer can hint or
>comment, but he has no right to complain.
>
>Because so many people complaint, chris threw the version from the server.

... so many people "complaint" ... you named 3, actually I didn't complain, so
what?

>Later a programmer put the older version (with one executable) again on the
>server because ordinary customers asked for the paris version.
>This programmer did not know about the broken engine, he only wanted to help
>ordinary customers.
>
>Now suddenly anybody here has forgotten this story although it was discussed
>month ago in rgcc.
>
>Suddenly moritz comes and says he tests the broken version although this version
>was replaced by the bette 289 version.

Which was again replaced by 284.

>We have now decided to delete 284 too.
>
>Now the customer gets no version (for free).
>
>The idea to support the customer with new version has died.
>Because we were unsatisfied with the comments we got from some "experts" and
>their strange point of "customer-rights".
>
>If you get something for free, why do you have the right to complain in public ?

Where did I complain? I just posted the games from a Nunn test where I even gave
CST a 2.5x speed advantage vs. Hiarcs! (PII-400 vs. P233MMX). Does this sound
like unfair conditions for CST?


>You don't have to use the FREE-Upgrade, or ?


Sorry, I just followed the recommendations in the readme file, assuming that the
author of that text knew what he was talking about.



Moritz



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.