Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 05:05:46 12/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 21, 2002 at 07:11:24, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: >> >>It is good. >> >>>>People that like it should see it... >>> >>>And people who have not seen it should also read the negative opinions about it. >> >>Sure. Nobody can form a valid opinion before actually seeing it, though. The >>*truth* (TM) is not that it is a bad movie or a good movie. If 90% of all people >>like it, then it is a good movie for them, if 10% happens not to like it, it's >>not a good movie for them. I urge people to form an opinion, > >I do not. > Yes you do. >>that means they >>have to see the movie. > >I see no need to have an opinion on every movie, not even on every popular >movie. >José. > Sure, if you're not interested in movies. But this movie, like it or not, is so important in the history of film making (as were the first, and as the third will be) that it is not just a movie. If you are interested in movies in general, you can't just ignore it. Also, I believe it is impossible to say "I don't want to see this movie, but I have no preconcieved opinion about it". If you decide not to see it, I bet it's because you have a negative preconcieved idea about it. It's much more valid to have a negative opinion aving seen it, than if you haven't. My simple argument is: This movie is an achievement in many ways in film making, most reviewers like it a lot, it gets a very high score on IMDB etc. Why not go see it and form your own opinion? Your argument is: Despite all of the above, don't go see it. Why? I don't know, just don't.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.