Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Positional Moves Vs Strong Human Masters (4 Programs)

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 05:49:26 12/21/02

Go up one level in this thread


On December 21, 2002 at 07:58:59, scott farrell wrote:

>On December 21, 2002 at 01:48:41, Dana Turnmire wrote:
>
>Great thread. I am working on this sort of thing at the moment. I have been
>trying to make it play GM moves, with lots of sacs, and positional trickery.

I think that it is a mistake to try to do the same as humans because I believe
that the assumption that GM's play better positional moves is wrong.

There are also cases when there are a lot of positional moves that lead to
almost the same evaluation.

If trying to learn to play moves of strong players is productive then
I see no reason to try to play the moves of GM's and not to try to play the
moves of the ssdf leaders(for example tiger's moves afainst ruffian).

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.