Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 12:13:26 12/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 20, 2002 at 19:51:00, Martin Giepmans wrote: > >I meant that I saw no difference between the line of Art >and your principal variation (the first 5 ply are the same) >Because you wrote "not the only one" I expected a different line. > >Martin I see. Yes, the main line was indeed the same. It was the first variation that was different (showing that White could win without playing that specific sacrifice). Also, I personally cannot easily read the notation he used (square-square instead of standard algebraic). And finally, a few extra branches were added. :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.