Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba
Date: 06:34:56 12/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 21, 2002 at 08:05:46, David Rasmussen wrote: > >Sure, if you're not interested in movies. But this movie, like it or not, is so >important in the history of film making Hahaha! Now you have made me laugh, thanks. >(as were the first, and as the third >will be) that it is not just a movie. I think it is just another movie. >If you are interested in movies in >general, you can't just ignore it. Of course I can. >Also, I believe it is impossible to say "I >don't want to see this movie, but I have no preconcieved opinion about it". I accept that I have a negative preconceived opinion about it. >If >you decide not to see it, I bet it's because you have a negative preconcieved >idea about it. Yes, indeed. >It's much more valid to have a negative opinion aving seen it, >than if you haven't. > >My simple argument is: This movie is an achievement in many ways in film making, >most reviewers like it a lot, it gets a very high score on IMDB etc. Why not go >see it and form your own opinion? The same can be said of several movies. Not all of them draw my attention. > >Your argument is: Despite all of the above, don't go see it. Why? I don't know, >just don't. If somebody wants to see it, I have nothing against. I have posted enought off-topic now. In the CTF there are very often discussions over movies, we can continue there if you want. I will be also happy to answer anytime you mention a movie I have seen, that I plan to see or one over which I already have a preconceived opinion. José.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.