Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 07:52:09 12/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 22, 2002 at 10:45:32, Jon Dart wrote: >> Seeing the consequences of black's kingside attack, is beyond the horizon of > any program, so they don't hurry to move their queenside attack forward. And > when they do see that black has a lethal attack, it is already too late to do >> anything. > >This is quite true, in my experience. I have seen this happen to my program >several times. > >Although, I did a look back in my game records, and was surprised to see that >the KID was played mostly in computer-computer games - I didn't see a lot of >humans play it. > >Many computers as White prefer to play the Saemisch (5. f3) rather than the >Classical lines. I think this is a better choice but I'm no expert. > Actually, when playing Saemisch, computers have problems playing the black side. They don't understand that in some variations despite white's castling queenside, black has to continue opening the kingside! Although having less problems in comparison to CKI, they still lack the strategic vision needed in king's Indian. But playing the white side, computers usually achieve good results with Saemisch. >--Jon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.