Author: John Lowe
Date: 08:11:51 12/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 22, 2002 at 09:31:27, Bob Durrett wrote: >On December 22, 2002 at 03:50:10, Bernhard Bauer wrote: > >>On December 22, 2002 at 02:08:23, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On December 21, 2002 at 20:37:24, Johan Hutting wrote: >>> >>>>On December 21, 2002 at 12:49:34, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>Hi Uri, >>>> >>>>>I believe that I have ideas that can help your program to get to commercial >>>>>level or better than it in the next year. >>>> >>>>That's nice, however.. having a good idea or several good ideas and implementing >>>>them are two different things. Why not implement them in Movei to show how well >>>>they work? In that case you'll at least get more positive replies. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>I know that there are a lot of programmers near crafty level that do not earn >>>>>money from their chess program so I believe that they cannot lose money from an >>>>>agreement that gives part of the money that they will earn from chess programs >>>>>to me because without me they are not going to earn money from their chess >>>>>program. >>>> >>>>Somehow this part seems quite insulting to other programmers... >>> >>>If it is insulting for programmers who are not near crafty level that >>>it is also insulting to myself because movei is still not near crafty level >>> >>>I did not mean to insult programmers. >>> >>>I did not say that it is easy to get crafty level but that there are a lot of >>>programmers that do not make money from their program and are near crafty level. >>> >>>In the last first division of Leo a lot of free amateurs performed better than >>>crafty. >>> >>>Uri >> >>I'm under the impression that you want to make money by using other's programs. >>I don't like your idea. Money is not all. Go away with your money and such nasty >>suggestions. >>CCC is *not* to make money, but to help one another to make better programs. >>I feel sorry for you Uri. >>Bernhard > >No, Bernhard, that's not what ICD's CCC was for. It was established as a place >where the members could ZAP each other at every opportunity. Computer chess is >just a convenient excuse. > >I advocate giving everybody the benefit of the doubt. None of us are perfect. >We should all make allowances for each other and patiently allow others to >stumble occasionally, as we all do. IMHO. > >Bob D. Hey Bob! None is the negative of one. You should have said "None of IS perfect"! (Can we stop this please?)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.