Author: John Lowe
Date: 08:16:04 12/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 22, 2002 at 06:55:53, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 22, 2002 at 02:39:14, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > >>On December 22, 2002 at 00:08:24, robert flesher wrote: >> >>> >>>[Event "?"] >>>[Site "?"] >>>[Date "2018.12.21"] >>>[Round "?"] >>>[White "Genius7"] >>>[Black "Robert"] >>>[Result "0-1"] >>>[ECO "E97"] >>> >>>1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. Nf3 O-O 5. e4 d6 6. Be2 e5 7. O-O Nc6 8. d5 >>>Ne7 9. Nd2 Nd7 10. b4 f5 11. f3 f4 12. Nb3 g5 13. Bb2 h5 14. c5 Nf6 15. Rc1 >>>Ng6 16. Nb5 Ne8 17. a3 Rf7 18. Nc3 Bf8 19. Nb1 Rg7 20. N1d2 Nh4 21. Qc2 g4 22. >>>Rf2 g3 23. hxg3 Rxg3 24. Bf1 Bh3 25. Kh1 Qg5 26. Nb1 Be7 27. Nc3 Kh8 28. cxd6 >>>cxd6 29. Na5 Nf6 30. Nd1 Rg8 31. Bxe5 dxe5 32. Ne3 fxe3 33. f4 Qg7 34. Re2 >>>34. Bxg2+ 35. Bxg2 Nxg2 36. Qc8 Rxc8 37. Rxc8+ Kh7 38. Rg8 >>>Qxg8 39. Kg1 Nxf4+ 40. Rg2 Rxg2+ 41. Kh1 Rg1+ 42. Kh2 Qg2 0-1 >>> >>>Im sure there were better moves and faster wins but i was having fun as i dont >>>get to win this easy very often. >> >>Playing the Classical King's Indian in an acceptable way, is something no >>program is able to do. > >The program that you tried do not know. >I think that saying no program may be wrong because it is possible that some >private programs know. > >I do not play that opening and it may be interesting to see games that programs >lose in this opening with comments about the mistakes of the programs and maybe >it may help programmers to think about ideas how to teach their program to play >this opening well. > >Uri I'm with you on this one Uri John
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.