Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 15:28:33 12/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 22, 2002 at 16:24:12, James T. Walker wrote: >On December 22, 2002 at 11:52:19, Fernando Villegas wrote: > >>It is this: http://www.mindscape.co.uk/products/ProductInfo.asp?pid=251 >>Get it: with any name is the most entertainning program ever to this day. >>Fernando > >The average chess player is around 1500 USCF and for those people CSTal is not >even close to Chessmaster for entertainment/training/playing levels/ etc. etc. >etc. CSTal is relagated to just a curiosity now. When it was developed it >could have been a great program if the programmer had not been so stubborn about >giving it maximum knowledge while sacrificing depth. It also has a couple of >bugs which he never bothered to fix (much like CB). Other than that it is >interesting to play against. >Jim Walker I don't see why it isn't a great program. Does another program give the human opponent the same experience? I've always thought that people had weird methods for determining whether a computer program was strong, for their own purposes. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.