Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: WAC 002, again... :)))

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 06:59:44 12/23/02

Go up one level in this thread

On December 23, 2002 at 09:34:12, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On December 23, 2002 at 09:31:16, Vladimir Medvedev wrote:
>
>>On December 23, 2002 at 09:17:49, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>
>>>On December 23, 2002 at 08:33:09, Vladimir Medvedev wrote:
>>>
>>>if you remove pawn on e3, does it also plan rxb2 initially then?
>>>
>>
>>No, it can't.
>
>why not?
>
>2 pawns on 6th+7th row is strong ain't it?

Rxb2? Rxb2 c3 Rb6+ Kg7 Ke3!
Of course if white didn't win the tempo with the check he would be dead.

[D]8/7p/4pk2/5p2/p1p2P2/Pr1p1K2/1P1R3P/8 b - - 0 1

Hard thing to evaluate staticly.

-S.

• Re: WAC 002, again... :))) Vincent Diepeveen 07:05:20 12/23/02
  • Re: WAC 002, again... :))) Sune Fischer 07:14:47 12/23/02
    • Re: WAC 002, again... :))) Bruce Moreland 11:06:01 12/23/02
    • Re: WAC 002, again... :))) Vincent Diepeveen 07:57:19 12/23/02
      • Re: WAC 002, again... :))) Robert Hyatt 08:54:37 12/23/02
        • Re: WAC 002, again... :))) Uri Blass 09:00:14 12/23/02
          • Re: WAC 002, again... :))) Robert Hyatt 17:00:56 12/23/02
        • Re: WAC 002, again... :))) Vincent Diepeveen 08:59:29 12/23/02
          • Re: WAC 002, again... :))) Robert Hyatt 17:08:12 12/23/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.