Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: WAC 002, again... :)))

Author: Vladimir Medvedev

Date: 07:41:03 12/23/02

Go up one level in this thread

>Movei can solve it without bonus for passed pawns and without bonus for
>connected passed pawns.

At which depth? Is it due to good pawn extensions, or due to some other [secret]
technique?

>Based on your words:
>If your target is to be better in test suites then use 350
>If your target is to be better in games use 275

Yes, this seems to me reasonable.

>other programmers may use different evaluation for rook,bishop,knight
>and different piece square table and different mobility evaluation.

In the sources I have read these values are quite typical (100-300-350-500-900,
plus or minus 10...50 centipawns).

• Re: WAC 002, again... :))) John Lowe 08:42:18 12/23/02
  • Correction - I meant bit 7 John Lowe 08:51:52 12/23/02
  • Re: WAC 002, again... :))) Vincent Diepeveen 08:47:30 12/23/02
    • Re: WAC 002, again... :))) John Lowe 09:13:33 12/23/02
      • Re: WAC 002, again... :))) Vincent Diepeveen 10:03:44 12/23/02
        • Re: WAC 002, again... :))) John Lowe 10:19:35 12/23/02
          • Re: WAC 002, again... :))) Vincent Diepeveen 10:22:34 12/23/02
            • Re: WAC 002, again... :))) John Lowe 11:01:56 12/23/02
              • Re: WAC 002, again... :))) Vincent Diepeveen 11:07:48 12/23/02
                • Re: WAC 002, again... :))) John Lowe 11:26:16 12/23/02
        • Re: WAC 002, again... :))) John Lowe 10:16:15 12/23/02
• Re: WAC 002, again... :))) Uri Blass 08:01:06 12/23/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.