Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:54:37 12/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 23, 2002 at 10:57:19, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On December 23, 2002 at 10:14:47, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>On December 23, 2002 at 10:05:20, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On December 23, 2002 at 09:59:44, Sune Fischer wrote: >>> >>>what i meant to say is that it's a peanut to solve WAC 002 >>>if you do not have the in quadrant rule. with the pawn on e3 >>>still the white king is within the quadrant of the pawns. >>> >>>So it is amazing for me how some programs can solve this at 8 or 9 >>>ply. Most commercials only solve this when they actually see a queen >>>on the board for black which can't get captured (or gets recaptured >>>to queen again). >> >>Even if you give a high score for passed pawn duos you are a whole rook behind >>because of the sacrifice, I doubt any program will find it for positional >>reasons. > >==> Crafty Wrong again. Why don't you try this stuff _first_??? > >>If you extend along the pawn pushes I guess it can be found at 8-9 ply. > >definitely. more important is extending the checks though ;) > >>-S. >>>Best regards, >>>Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.