Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 08:59:29 12/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 23, 2002 at 11:54:37, Robert Hyatt wrote: I remember for years how you proudly posted that you solved this trick at 9 ply or so with old crafty versions :) So if we dig up a few old versions from a few years ago that should be not so hard to proof :) >On December 23, 2002 at 10:57:19, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On December 23, 2002 at 10:14:47, Sune Fischer wrote: >> >>>On December 23, 2002 at 10:05:20, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On December 23, 2002 at 09:59:44, Sune Fischer wrote: >>>> >>>>what i meant to say is that it's a peanut to solve WAC 002 >>>>if you do not have the in quadrant rule. with the pawn on e3 >>>>still the white king is within the quadrant of the pawns. >>>> >>>>So it is amazing for me how some programs can solve this at 8 or 9 >>>>ply. Most commercials only solve this when they actually see a queen >>>>on the board for black which can't get captured (or gets recaptured >>>>to queen again). >>> >>>Even if you give a high score for passed pawn duos you are a whole rook behind >>>because of the sacrifice, I doubt any program will find it for positional >>>reasons. >> >>==> Crafty > >Wrong again. Why don't you try this stuff _first_??? > > >> >>>If you extend along the pawn pushes I guess it can be found at 8-9 ply. >> >>definitely. more important is extending the checks though ;) >> >>>-S. >>>>Best regards, >>>>Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.