Author: blass uri
Date: 06:53:20 09/20/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 20, 1998 at 05:10:26, Ed Schröder wrote: >>Ed - i do completely subscribe your position. >>you try to fight for fair competition. >>stand the pressure. > >Thanks for supporting my view. > >>don't let the others "convince" you with the means of their feet. >>It is important that the ssdf recognize that they cannot do whatever they want, >>especially when it comes to "special negotiations" and special conditions with >>only ONE participant. > >I do not think this is the case. I think the SSDF handled in all fairness. They >only took a wrong decision not realizing the disadvantages of that decision. > >>You always argued that there was a common sense, that all programmers >>subscribed, to implement the auto232 driver into their programs, to support >>this >>driver. this common sense of all programmers was impolitely broken by matthias >>decision not to support the autoplayer in public. > >I have read in CSS their motives, I believe them and understand better now. >It's indeed not funny if your opening book is shot into pieces. I am not sure if I understand. Do they say that the reason that they did a secret autoplayer is that they were afraid of opening preperation in the next ssdf list?. I know that the powerbook of them is a bad book and I think that this is the reason that they did better in the ssdf list when they play many games against the same opponent because in this way they can learn the good lines of the big book that they use. I want the ssdf list producers to produce another list based on only the first 2 games with opposite colours between opponents. I believe that in this list Fritz5 will not be first. and I think that the results of Fritz5 with the powerbook will not be better than the results of fritz5 without the powerbook Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.