Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: WHAT is the definition of a backward pawn?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 12:17:06 12/24/02

Go up one level in this thread


On December 24, 2002 at 14:00:22, Bas Hamstra wrote:

>>A "backward" pawn is a pawn that can't advance without being captured by
>>an enemy pawn, and it is not defendable by a friendly pawn.  The classic
>>example is white pawns on d3 and e4 and a black pawn on e5.  The white pawn
>>on d3 is backward.  Backward pawns are _generally_ on half-open files so that
>>they can be attacked from the front by enemy rooks, which makes them even
>>weaker.
>>
>>A backward pawn is really just a specific example of a weak pawn.  For
>>example black has pawns at c5 and e5.  White has a pawn at d3 and e3.
>>The white pawn can't advance as it would be attacked by two pawns and defended
>>by one, and it would go lost unless white piles up enough pieces to make that
>>pawn push doable, which would tie up pieces and give black a chance to start
>>action somewhere else.
>
>But suppose it can advance but it never ever can become pawn-defended? Wouldn't
>that be a nice attack-object too? How essential is it that the pawn cannot move?
>I am about to try that idea.
>

It depends.  A "backward" pawn can't move.  A weak pawn can move but even after
moving it will remain weak and might even be lost.

>- - - - - - - -
>- - - B - - - -
>- - - W - - - -
>- - - - - - - -
>- - - - - - - -
>- - - - - - - -
>- - - - W - - -
>- - - - - - - -
>
>The e-pawn is sort of dead. What's your opinion about this? Of course there are
>exceptions, white can sack it's e-pawn at e6 to get a freepawn, if it gets far
>enough. But the fact remains that the e-pawn is not ever pawn-defendable and
>therefore weak.
>

The e-pawn is certainly backward, and it is on an open file, so it is
a weakness that will cause some difficulties.  More-so with rooks still
on the board.



>>Ignore backward and catch the weak pawns instead, as that will include
>>backward and a large group of other types of weak pawns that are not
>>backward.
>
>I already do that in Tao, but I am not satisfied about it's evaluation of
>pawnstructures at the moment. Crafty does a better job here.
>
>Best regards,
>Bas.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.