Author: Martin Giepmans
Date: 15:11:51 12/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 24, 2002 at 12:32:55, John Lowe wrote: >On December 23, 2002 at 15:37:07, Martin Giepmans wrote: > >>On December 23, 2002 at 15:16:44, Mike Byrne wrote: >> >>>[d]R6R/3Q4/1Q4Q1/4Q3/2Q4Q/Q4Q2/pp1Q4/kBNN1KB1 w - - 0 1 >>> >>>So far , every Palm program and Chess Tiger have fatal errors with this >>>position. Supossedly, this is the largest number of possible legal number of >>>moves, 218, available from one position in chess. If you can prove this wrong, >>>you'll go down in History. >>> >>>http://www.rescon.de/Compu/schachzahl2_e.html >> >> >>"Qd2xb2 mate!" says my program. 29 nodes calculated to find this brilliancy. >> >>It didn't blow up, the monitor didn't explode in my face, the AMD-processor >>didn't implode, even my cigarette didn't catch fire ... >> >>I must say that I find this at least a little bit disappointing ;) >> >>Martin > >Hi Martin, > >You can borrow my failure if you like. Thanks! Do you really want it back? > >How did you manage to calculate 29 nodes before you found a mate in one? I don't know if you grinned when you wrote that. Do you mean that 29 is way too much for a mate in (only) one <grin> or do you mean that 29 is not enough? Martin
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.