Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: C and C++ --- NPS

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 12:25:28 12/25/02

Go up one level in this thread

On December 25, 2002 at 10:33:19, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On December 25, 2002 at 06:32:57, David Rasmussen wrote:
>>On December 24, 2002 at 11:11:38, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>>On December 24, 2002 at 05:29:47, David Rasmussen wrote:
>>>It's very trivial that when you use high level language
>>>constructions in c++ that it is way slower than C.
>>>on the other hand it is possible to write a kind of C a look
>>>like c++ which is trivially having the same speed like C.
>>>I do not understand why people argue about that.
>>Argue about what?
>>>No C++ isn't faster. No C++ doesn't need to be slower. It's
>>>basically the same language with c++ having a few constructions
>>>that enable OO programming which are high level and very dead
>>>slow to use.
>>Now you're showing your enourmous ignorance again. Don't embarrass yourself
>Show code. then i'll show you the C code of it (if it ain't too much c++).

No, do it the other way.  You show the C code first.  That way we can rename .c
to .cpp, Q.E.D. :-)


This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.