Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:37:48 12/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 25, 2002 at 17:57:15, Scott Gasch wrote: >On December 25, 2002 at 16:31:55, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 25, 2002 at 16:18:20, Scott Gasch wrote: >> >>>On December 25, 2002 at 13:09:45, Sune Larsson wrote: >>>> >>>> 5rk1/1ppq1rb1/p2p1nn1/3Pp3/2P1Ppp1/PPN3P1/3BQPB1/2R2RK1 w - - 0 25 >>>> >>>... >>>> >>>> CM 9000Utz12 25.Qd3 -0.15 Ply 14 64 Mb hash >>>> Shredder PB 25.Qd3 -0.28 Ply 14 128 Mb hash >>>> Hiarcs 8 25.Qd3 -0.55 Ply 13 128 Mb hash >>>> Fritz 8 25.Qd3 -0.59 Ply 14 128 Mb hash >>>> Ruffian 25.Qd3 -0.69 Ply 14 128 Mb hash >>>> Chess Tiger14 25.Bh1 -1.50 Ply 14 96 Mb hash >>>> GambitTiger 2 25.Qd3 -2.26 Ply 14 96 Mb hash >>>> >>> >>> Monsoon -1.17 for white static eval at root >>> Monsoon 25. Qd3 -4.18 Ply 14 512 Mb hash >>> >>>If possible, monsoon is too pessamistic about this position? It is unhappy with >>>white's position when I run a static evaluation of the position and when I let >>>it search it gets worse and worse. By ply 14, as you can see, it's much more >>>unhappy than any of these better engines. >> >>Can you explain how do you get -1.17 static evaluation? >> >>material is equal and no squares near the king are attacked by black pieces. >>I also do not see significant mobility advantage for black(white has 31 moves >>and after Qd3 black has 34 moves). >> >>A possible reason to see big adantage for black is mobility of the bishop after f3 Bh1 but you need 2 plies for that and you cannot see it by static evaluation. >> > >Monsoon thinks: > >Black has a slight edge in pawn structure, mainly because of perceived defects >on white's structure at c4 and f2. I do not see special defects at c4 and f2(c4 is even defended by a pawn) > >White's knight at c3 is scored a bit better than either of black's knights. > >White's bishops are both penalized because the position looks somewhat closed >and neither has very good mobility. I will not count f3, e3 or h3 as mobility >squares because of the black pawns on f4 and g4. I will not count f4 as a >mobility square because of the pawn at e5. > >Black's rooks are positioned strongly to attack white's king and support the >pawn storm. How do you evaluate it? As an human I see that black rooks are strong but computer needs exact definition. White's rook at f7 seems not to have mobility(only one square to go) > >White's king safety penalty is higher than black's because black has more pieces >defending the king. How do you see it as a computer? You can claim that white has only the rook to defend the king and black has rook f8 and knight at f6 but I guess that you do not mean it. > White has a pawn storm to worry about while black does not. How do you see it as a computer? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.