Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: C and C++ --- NPS

Author: Matt Taylor

Date: 19:23:28 12/25/02

Go up one level in this thread


On December 25, 2002 at 15:56:19, Dave Gomboc wrote:

>On December 25, 2002 at 15:38:19, Matt Taylor wrote:
>
>>>Overloading costs nothing, it's a compile time construct and is resolved at
>>>compile/link time.
>>>Inheritance costs nothing, it too is a compile/link time issue.
>>>You know nothing about C++, do you? I didn't think so.
>>
>>Overloading costs an indirect function call. I'm not sure if you can apply const
>>to a class like you can apply final to one in Java, but unless the compiler
>>knows the class can't be inherited from, it has to make the operator an indirect
>>function call.
>
>Calling a class const in C++ means something else, but a C++ compiler can (and
>some do) figure out which classes are at the bottom of the inheritance hierarchy
>at compile-time.  (Unlike with Java, this isn't mutable at run-time.)
>
>Dave

Ah, sorry, I was somehow thinking of Java where everything can be overloaded
unless you say otherwise. Still, polymorphism still does not come for free.

Another thing which C++ cannot do involves elimination of branches. If you have
a switch/case with a few cases and a small number of computations, the best
thing to do is compute them all and conditionally select the result (does not
require branching).

-Matt



This page took 0.03 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.