Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Does this position blow up your program? 2

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 02:59:23 12/26/02

Go up one level in this thread


On December 26, 2002 at 05:17:03, Sune Fischer wrote:

>On December 25, 2002 at 23:23:48, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>
>>[D] Q2Q2Q1/1R6/3BR3/3k3N/2RB2Q1/5R2/Q2Q2Bp/3N3K w - - 0 1
>>
>>Problem:
>>White to move
>>If white gives check it has to be mate in one.
>>Find a legal position with the highest number of possible checks.
>>
>>I discovered this 5 years ago. Took me about 16 hours to find it.
>>I think it is possible to find a proof that it is not possible to find more:
>>
>>85 mates in one! :-)
>
>Are you sure, I "only" count 78 mates??
>
>Mates ply 0........: 0
>Mates ply 1........: 78
>Mates ply 2........: 0
>Mates ply 3........: 468
>Mates ply 4........: 0
>Mates ply 5........: 9538
>
>how did you count them?
>
>>I must have been crazy.
>
>Yes, you will fit right in here :)
>
>-S.


modified perft of movei agree with your numbers.

It counts 1380065-10084 mates at ply 7 and 0 mates in ply 8

Number of stalemates
52 at depth 1
781-52 at depth 3
12034-781 at depth 5
2095567-12034 at depth 7

Can you check that these numbers are correct?


Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.