Author: Uri Blass
Date: 18:48:49 12/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 2002 at 20:32:22, Terry McCracken wrote: >On December 26, 2002 at 19:34:09, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 26, 2002 at 19:24:35, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On December 26, 2002 at 19:06:56, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On December 26, 2002 at 18:51:50, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>Kasparov was not allowed to study his electronic opponent's playing style prior >>>>>to the match. By contrast, Kasparov will be given a copy of Deep Junior before >>>>>the start of the contest. This allowed Kasparov to prepare in a similar way as >>>>>he would for a match with a grandmaster - by analysing his previous games. Deep >>>>>Blue was also reprogrammed following each game, but will Deep Junior be allowed >>>>>too ? >>>>> >>>>>Pichard. >>>> >>>> >>>>Where did you read that kasparov will be given a copy of the opponent? >>>> >>>>I believe that kasparov is going to get only relatively old version of Junior. >>>> >>>>I think that the only way to let kasparov to prepare in a similiar way as he >>>>would for a match with a grandmaster is simply not to give him old version of >>>>the program(it mean no commercial or freeware against kasparov) but to let the >>>>new version of the program to play public games against GM's. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>Uri, why would Kasparov get an old version? >>> >>>I'd say he's using Junior 8 Beta, and a few weeks after the match, Junior 8 will >>>be available from ChessBase. I'll guess sometime around March;-) >>> >>>Terry >> >>Why would Amir Ban give kasparov Junior8 beta? >>He has no reason to do it. >> >>I guess that kasaprov's version is something that is more close to Junior7 than >>Junior8. >> >>Uri > >Uri, why do you say this stuff? Why would Kramnik get to use Fritz 8 Beta, and >Kasparov only gets to use Junior 7 or the equivalent? > >It wouldn't be too fair either; Would it? > >Terry Kramnik-Fritz was unfair from the start. kramnik also did not care about losing a piece based on his words and he even did not admit that he blundered when he resigned. It simply seems to be a behaviour of a player that does not care about the result in the best case. I do not care about kramnik(the fact that kramnik played unfair match does not mean that kasparov is going to do the same) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.