Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 08:27:22 12/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2002 at 10:27:47, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >On December 27, 2002 at 08:33:28, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>On December 26, 2002 at 21:21:52, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>Hi Ed, >> >>I believe it's the false way to write this. >>You know my opinion about different things to the topic "CSS". >> >>But I am sure also the CSS Team try to make a good work. >>Right ways or not ... is this important? >>So I think I learn that all this is not important! >> >>Every user must find the right way and so I believe that every criticism is bad >>for the group of users which search information via WWW. >> >>Good luck with your new webpage! >>Nice to have your person for the next 30 years in the middle of the group. >> >>Best >>Frank > >Schäm dich! > >Grund: vor einem Jahr sprachst Du andere Worte in "deinem" Forum, ja in DEINEM >Forum. > >Eduard What earning a lousy 50 marks for writing a page A4 in the CSS can do to a person... Doesn't take away that CSS is a computerchess magazine with its only flaw that if a new engine is released the highest glory it can get is 'nearly as good as fritz' and competitors of chessbase get cracked down because of some detail. I always wonder how they manage to explain that Junior and Shredder won the past 6 years all serious world titles and still are not at Fritz level (according to the magazine) :) Yet apart from these big flaws which make me spit out the magazine always there is another 20 pages in the magazine or so which sometimes contain good articles / intervies etc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.