Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 11:12:27 12/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2002 at 12:18:13, Mike Byrne wrote: >On December 27, 2002 at 02:45:16, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On December 26, 2002 at 19:53:10, Mike S. wrote: >> >>>On December 26, 2002 at 19:34:25, Mike Byrne wrote: >>> >>>>28. Be4! a super grandmaster move, by a super grandmaster. >>>> >>>>Any programs come up with this? >>>>[d]2nq1nk1/5p1p/4p1pQ/pb1pP1NP/1p1P2P1/1P4N1/P4PB1/6K1 w - - >>> >>>It looks like White can insert the zwischenzug 28.hxg6, whereafter Black has to >>>defend against the simple threat gxh7+ Kh8 (Nxh7 doesn't make much sense either) >>>Nxf7 mate, first. IOW it looks to me as if Be4 doesn't have to be played >>>immediatly (I didn't analyse much). >>> >>>It's often a problem with test positions when the attacker can play a simple but >>>strong threat alternatively (and delay the intended solution, so you don't know >>>if the program has missed it or is just going to play it later...). >>> >>>Analysis by Fritz 7 (P3/700, 96 MB hash): >>> >>>1.hxg6 fxg6 2.Nxh7 Nxh7 3.Qxg6+ Kh8 4.Qxe6 Bd7 5.Qxd5 Ng5 6.Nf5 Ne6 >>> ² (0.63) Depth: 8/27 00:00:00 301kN >>> ± (0.91) Depth: 12/35 00:00:23 7799kN >>>1.Be4 Be8 2.hxg6 hxg6 3.Nh5 gxh5 4.Bh7+ Nxh7 5.Nxh7 f5 6.Nf6+ Kf7 7.Nxh5 Ke7 >>>8.Qg7+ >>> ± (0.94) Depth: 12/35 00:00:38 12492kN >>> ± (1.09) Depth: 13/36 00:01:09 23280kN >>> >>>Regards, >>>M.Scheidl >> >>Hi Mike >>I fully agree. This test position is not a good one because at least three moves >>are easily winning here, namely 1.Be4, 1.hxg6 and 1.Nxh7 >> >>Below the analysis of Shredder7 ond P4 1.8/32 MB hash: >> >>New game >>2nq1nk1/5p1p/4p1pQ/pb1pP1NP/1p1P2P1/1P4N1/P4PB1/6K1 w - - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Shredder 7: >> >>1.hxg6 hxg6 2.Qh8+ Kxh8 3.Nxf7+ Kg8 4.Nxd8 g5 5.Nb7 a4 6.bxa4 Bc4 7.Nd6 Nxd6 >>8.exd6 Bxa2 >> +- (1.44) Depth: 1/7 00:00:00 >> +- (2.21) Depth: 10/26 00:00:01 525kN >>1.Nxh7 Nxh7 2.hxg6 fxg6 3.Qxg6+ Kh8 4.Qxe6 Ne7 5.Nf5 Nxf5 6.gxf5 Qc7 7.Qh6 >> +- (2.22) Depth: 10/26 00:00:02 631kN >> +- (2.29) Depth: 15/41 00:01:57 31632kN >>1.Be4 Be8 2.hxg6 hxg6 3.Nh5 gxh5 4.Bh7+ Nxh7 5.Nxh7 f5 6.exf6 Qc7 7.f7+ Kh8 >> +- (2.30) Depth: 15/42 00:03:52 60969kN >> +- (2.30) Depth: 15/42 00:03:52 60969kN >> >>(Utzinger, MyTown 27.12.2002) > > >It may not be a good test position - I was just admiring the game itself. I am >reviewing Chess Informant "DEMO BASE" with 500 annotated games selected from >various Informants. Their new software, which I purchased, "Chess Informant >Expert 4.0"( about $52) -- is very very cool. It allows for full import and >export of CI electronic Informants to PGN and vica-versa. This could be very >useful in building a quality book :>). > >There are also little known secrets in acquiring all of the Chess Informants >books electronically (and legally) at modest cost. > >Chess Informant 83 CD, includes as a special bonus, all of the Chess Informant >Games Volume 1-82 in PGN format(without annotations). It's highlighted on thier >webpage ( http://www.sahovski.com/default.htm) , just go to the "Shop online" >select electronic editions and find the "Chess Informants 83 & 84". >You will get "Chess Informants 83 and 84 CD" for price of one(about $32). So >for about $84, you can get Chess Informants 1-84 electronically with software >that you will allow you to export and import into PGN files. > >Michael Byrne You was just admiring the games - I do the same because I wouldn't have played myself the fine biship maneouvre 1.Be4. Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.