Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 09:30:25 12/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2002 at 09:52:58, Bob Durrett wrote: >On December 27, 2002 at 23:15:42, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On December 27, 2002 at 21:38:07, Bob Durrett wrote: >> >>>On December 27, 2002 at 21:13:55, Drexel,Michael wrote: >>> > > >It's excessive reliance on computer analyses which would be detrimental? Like >just playing the computer's moves in correspondence chess? > >Perhaps there is a "correct" way to use chess analysis machines and a "wrong" >way. It is noteworthy that Kasparov says he uses Fritz in his home analyses. >Perhaps he does it the "correct way." Why cannot I do that too? I presume Kasparov did not use Fritz much better then we do, but he is able to rule out much more possibilities. he feels that some moves Fritz suggests are not worth to examine. > >I print the key positions, which I failed to solve during my games, in a >notebook and look at them every now and then. Since my memory is not so hot >anymore, I occasionally have to "resolve" the positions when I look at them, >assuming it has been awhile since the last time. Then I look at the solutions >to see if I got it right this time. Surely, this cannot be a bad thing to do! >The computer is not involved at all after the positions and solutions have been >printed. > >Bob D. > I think it is not important to keep the positions you failed to solve. it is important to understand why you failed in this positions in order to understand better the nature of this sort of positions next time. ><snip>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.