Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 16:42:38 12/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2002 at 09:45:02, Drexel,Michael wrote: >[D] 8/8/pp6/2pp2p1/3p2Pk/3P1K1P/5PP1/8 b - - 0 1 > >Ruffian is the best analysis-engine I can think of. >Ruffian 1.0.1 (96 MB hash)on Athlon@1.6Ghz finds the mate in 13 >in 5 sec (Yes 0:05!!) . This is amazing. >hey you out there with your 2.8 Ghz Xeons and Deep Fritz 7 engines. >Try to beat that! >hope Per-ola will bring out a native Chessbase version of this great program >soon because there exists some problems with UCI version in Chessbase GUI. >I would pay 25$ for a native CB engine. >I dont need chess engines with much positional knowledge for analysis. every >chessplayer >2200 has much more positional knowledge than all chess-engines >together. Aside from using Ruffian to find mates, what would you use it for? What does any chess master do with a chess engine during analysis, and why? Also, other than positional analyses, what else do you NOT use a chess analysis engine for? How can you tell when you are becoming too dependent on the analysis engine? I really do want to know. Incidentally, I am not a chess master. Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.