Author: Paolo Casaschi
Date: 06:45:53 12/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
> A statistic that Playchess could generate, that wouldn’t be completely > meaningless would be results by engines of all games played. Seems that > wouldn’t be too difficult as they already show what engine you are > playing with. I agree. But, if you were chessbase, would you publish those data or would you use them and keep them for yourself ? > >Regards, > >Chris > > > >On December 29, 2002 at 07:00:37, Christopher A. Morgan wrote: > >> >>Rick, >> >>In my limited engine-engine testing S7 has an edge over F8. The testing so far >>is three 24 game blitz matches, 5'+5" and 10'+5", with and without tablebases, >>each using its own book (results posted below). >> >>I’m now into game 5 of a 24 game engine-engine match using classical tournament >>time controls, 120'/40+60'/20+30+10". The time increment of +10" for the third >>time control was added just to make sure that after nearly seven hours of >>playing a game one engine didn’t run out of time at the end of the game. >>Results so far 2-2, with each engine winning one game, and two draws. >> >>I know all the criticisms of the results of engine engine matches but I have >>found that my engine matches and engine tournament results over the last several >>years’ time track the SSDF list so they are not meaningless IMHO. >> >>The problem of playing on the Playchess server is that you have no idea what >>processor(s) your opponents are playing with which makes the results >>meaningless. For instance some “deep” versions could be playing with two, four, >>eight processor machines. Shredder 7 is deep without the name and your opponent >>could be playing with a multi-processor machine on S7. I think it would be >>technically possible for the server to also indicate processor(s)/RAM/hash info >>if a user allowed access to a user’s computer. I would like to see that. >> >>Regards, >> >>Chris >> >> >>On December 29, 2002 at 04:02:44, Rick Terry wrote: >> >>>I think this is a very strong program with lots of Chess Knowledge, it appears >>>to do well on chessbase server, I expect it to top the SSDF list how many agree?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.