Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 16:57:08 12/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 30, 2002 at 16:49:23, robert flesher wrote: >Without the opening knowledge that we all attain as we become better players the >game is NO longer Chess it a matter of speaking. The computers must have the >basic positions of all the major openings as these are time tested and proven to >be sound in relative terms. I have stated that engines are tuned for certain >positions, this is one of the strength's and should not be taken away from them. >Its like asking, or telling Mikhail Tal he cannot sac.....//Botvinnik would have >thanked us:)//...... there goes his strength, his edge!. If the concern is the >rating?use the Nunn test positions where each engine gets a chance to evaluate a >key, well known position. To watch computer's battle through the opening seems >like a waste of time to me as they still lack the long term strategic >understanding needed. The day i see a computer play the Marshall Gambit, Morra >Gambit, or other genuine pawn sacks in the opening for positional play, or to >get an edge, then i will change my mind. Cheers~ Chess programs are like a blind man with a cane. They can see everything within the cane radius, but absolutely nothing beyond it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.