Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Facts and assuptions on Hammer arch.

Author: Matt Taylor

Date: 20:18:31 12/30/02

Go up one level in this thread


On December 30, 2002 at 19:32:57, Dan Andersson wrote:

>http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/amd-hammer-family/index.html
>The memory part is interesting. If it works out in practice it will be fast
>miltiprocessing.
>
>MvH Dan Andersson

Most of the facts were grossly wrong, but yes, the memory system implemented on
x86-64 chips is very interesting.

I struggle to believe that they have achieved 55-ns access times. My system is
based around the 760MPX chipset and uses Registered/ECC ram, and my access time
is about 133 ns (not the 200 ns the article claims). By integrating the memory
controller, they probably achieve access times of ~90-100 ns. The biggest
latency here is the memory itself, not the controller.

Four-way systems have been built and demonstrated by AMD. AMD is keeping the
performance figures hush-hush, but the one thing they have said is that an
eight-way system will have no more latency worst-case than existing
single-processor systems. With an OS that understands the architecture, you'll
get better performance.

-Matt



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.