Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: new warnings in the new intel compiler

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 06:33:48 12/31/02

Go up one level in this thread


On December 31, 2002 at 09:26:55, Daniel Clausen wrote:

>On December 31, 2002 at 09:13:15, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>How do I get rid of this warning?
>>
>>C:\unzipped\movei257source\main.c(939): warning #181: argument is incompatible
>>with corresponding format string conversion
>>  num_fields=sscanf(buffer,"level%s %s %s %s %s %s %s %s
>>%s",&str1,&str2,&str3,&str4,&str5,&str6,
>>
>>Is there something wrong with the following?
>>
>>int num_fields=0;
>>char
>>str1[10],str2[10],str3[10],str4[10],str5[10],str6[10],str7[10],str8[10],str9[10];
>>num_fields=sscanf(buffer,"level%s %s %s %s %s %s %s %s
>>%s",&str1,&str2,&str3,&str4,&str5,&str6,
>>	   &str7,&str8,&str9);
>>
>>I use it to read the winboard command after level(can be not more than 9 even in
>>the extended level command).
>>There were no problems with it but for some reasons the intel compiler see
>>problems.
>
>Not sure that the compiler means this, but you can/should skip the &-signs in
>str1-str9.
>
>In C, if you have an array like 'char str1[10]', 'str1' is equal to '&str1[0]',
>so it's already an address. Adding an additional '&' does not hurt, but it does
>nothing and may generate a warning.
>
>HTH
>
>Sargon

Thanks

You are right and now I got rid from the warning.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.