Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 22:46:20 12/31/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2002 at 23:22:00, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On December 31, 2002 at 23:15:53, Dan Andersson wrote: > >>The 8-way chipset was the product of another company. They canned it. And then >>AMD was already on the way with the Hammer. So they could not be bothered to do >>it themselves. And the easy out disappeared when Intel got the Alpha processor >>infrastructure. >> >>MvH Dan Andersson > >thanks, intel really seems to have put those alpha guys to work. That >McKinley blows away the 21264 for me *bigtime*. I would bet you have _never_ touched a 21264. It was marginally faster for me than mckinley. Tim had a 600mhz machine that hit 800K with crafty. > >Very impressive for a 2nd version of the Itanium. > >Can't wait to see how the I3 is going to be. If such processors get >SMT on chip it is going to be perhaps really very well performing. SMT doesn't fit Itanium very well... > >Imagine they make it 4 threads a cpu. In which case i could run at a >128 processor partition already like 500 processes easily!!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.