Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 02:23:57 01/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 01, 2003 at 01:58:01, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >Itanium2 blows the 21264 away for me. It's just that crafty cannot >profit too much from the next major advantage McKinley offers offers >over the 21264 for IPC: > >Look to this table: > >McKinley 6 instructions a cycle (bundles) >Alpha 4 instructions a cycle If you're going to post such simplistic tables, without much understanding of the data contained in them, here is a 'table' for you: McKinley - strictly in-order execution Alpha - out-of-order execution Make of it what you will.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.