Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:49:07 01/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 01, 2003 at 05:23:57, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >On January 01, 2003 at 01:58:01, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>Itanium2 blows the 21264 away for me. It's just that crafty cannot >>profit too much from the next major advantage McKinley offers offers >>over the 21264 for IPC: >> >>Look to this table: >> >>McKinley 6 instructions a cycle (bundles) >>Alpha 4 instructions a cycle > >If you're going to post such simplistic tables, without much understanding of >the data contained in them, here is a 'table' for you: > >McKinley - strictly in-order execution >Alpha - out-of-order execution > >Make of it what you will. Which will be exactly _nothing_. Have you not figured out that he simply tosses buzzwords and terms around without understanding _any_ of them in any kind of technical detail???
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.