Author: Pavel Blokhine
Date: 17:01:14 01/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 01, 2003 at 17:17:32, Roger D Davis wrote: >Kasparov has plenty of motivation to win. > >Since Fritz is stronger than Junior, if Kasparov loses to Junior, then Kramnik >is stronger than Kasparov. Obviously, this is not exactly correct, since in >chess A beats B and B beats C, but C beats A, but it reinforces the notion that >Kramnik is stronger nonetheless. If Kasparov loses, it looks really bad. > >Roger What proof do you have the Fritz is stronger than Jumior? Didn't Deep Jumior won the world championship two years a row?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.