Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: [half OT] Need help: choice of an IDE to build Chess Tiger for Linux

Author: Daniel Clausen

Date: 19:50:18 01/02/03

Go up one level in this thread


Ok, forget KDevelop 3.0, since it's alpha still.

I've tried the latest stable version (2.1.4 - RH8 comes with 2.1.3) though and
did the following:

-created project of type "Terminal/C++"
-added a class with "Project->New Class"
-added existing class via "Project->Add Existing Files"
-made errors on purpose in all files
-built the stuff
-could click on each error and the correct file appeared

But maybe I missed something :)


On January 02, 2003 at 21:22:29, Christophe Theron wrote:


>Yeah I could use makefiles, but I was looking for something a little bit more
>friendly.
>
>You know, I'm already using several different IDEs, and I really don't want to
>learn something complicated.

While I agree that Makefile/Editor/gdb is not so user-friendly, it's not
complicated at all. You can make one Makefile which compiles all source files it
finds in directories and links them to one executable, and you never have to
change the Makefile again. Sounds pretty simple to me.


[snip]

>I was looking for something simple and efficient. OK, I realize how naive I can
>be... :)

:))

I hope that these things don't stop you from porting Tiger. ;)

Sargon



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.