Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 06:24:07 01/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2003 at 04:41:30, Alastair Scott wrote: C++ and $$$$$$$$$$$$ You of course only use QT to cross develop. So it doesn't matter whether the LINUX version or the windows version costs $$$$. you want both. in that case QT is $$$$$$ for something other simple cross compile stuff supports for very cheap $. >On January 02, 2003 at 18:49:40, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>Sorry to bother you with this half off-topic post, but I know there are Linux >>fans here, and maybe they can help me. >> >>And after all it's all about a chess program! >> >>I want to port Chess Tiger to Linux, and release it as a free engine (without >>sources). Later I hope to make a commercial product out of it, when enough >>people start to use Linux (will take anywhere between 2 and 10 years). >> >>But right now here is my problem: I am running RedHat Linux 8.0. I don't want to >>use another distribution. I have chosen it because it has the biggest market >>share (sorry, I know I am commercially-biased). >> >>I'm looking for a good IDE to run on my RH8. >> >>At this time I only need to develop console mode programs. > >Although it supports the full GUI toolkit I think QT Designer would be perfectly >good for developing console-only programs: > >http://www.trolltech.com/products/qt/ > >I find it the "stablest and best". QT also has the interesting feature of being >cross-platform with runtimes for Mac and Windows so, when you come to write that >GUI ... :) > >Almost any modern Linux distribution will either install QT Designer as part of >'development tools' or provide an RPM somewhere. > >An interesting alternative is Anjuta, which I installed a few days ago and am >quite impressed with (as are others): > >http://anjuta.sourceforge.net/ > >Alastair
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.