Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What is the real score here?

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 05:19:10 01/04/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 04, 2003 at 07:55:38, Uri Blass wrote:

>It seems that there are more traps here but it seems that Rd2 is enough to win
>Here is Deep Fritz6's opinion on p850:

It is full of traps I think, with all the checks and passed pawns it hard to see
clearly.

>New position
>[D]3q4/3P2kp/5p2/p7/1p1R2P1/5P2/2Q3K1/4r3 w - - 0 1
>
>Analysis by Deep Fritz:
>
>3.Qxh7+--
>  -+  (-6.41)   Depth: 1/3   00:00:00
>3.Qxh7+-- Kxh7
>  -+  (-9.06)   Depth: 1/3   00:00:00
>3.Rxb4!
>  -+  (-7.59)   Depth: 1/3   00:00:00
>3.Rxb4! axb4
>  -+  (-4.50)   Depth: 1/3   00:00:00
>3.g5!
>  -+  (-3.72)   Depth: 1/3   00:00:00
>3.g5! fxg5
>  -+  (-2.25)   Depth: 1/3   00:00:00
>3.Qf5!
>  -+  (-2.19)   Depth: 1/4   00:00:00
>3.Qf5! Re2+ 4.Kh1
>  µ  (-1.06)   Depth: 1/4   00:00:00
>3.Qf5 Re2+ 4.Kh1
>  µ  (-1.06)   Depth: 2/6   00:00:00
>3.Qf5 Re5 4.Qd3
>  µ  (-1.16)   Depth: 3/8   00:00:00
>3.Qc8!
>  µ  (-1.12)   Depth: 3/9   00:00:00
>3.Qc8! Rg1+ 4.Kf2 Rg2+ 5.Kxg2
>  +-  (4.00)   Depth: 3/12   00:00:00  1kN
>3.Qc8 Re2+ 4.Kf1 Rf2+ 5.Kxf2
>  +-  (4.19)   Depth: 4/11   00:00:00  2kN
>3.Qc8!
>  +-  (4.50)   Depth: 5/14   00:00:00  6kN
>3.Qc8! Qe7 4.d8Q Qe2+ 5.Kg3 Rg1+ 6.Kh3 Qxf3+ 7.Kh2
>  +-  (5.69)   Depth: 5/16   00:00:00  13kN
>3.Qc8--
>  +-  (5.38)   Depth: 6/16   00:00:00  16kN
>3.Qc8-- Qe7 4.Re4 Rxe4 5.d8Q Qxd8 6.Qxd8
>  ±  (1.31)   Depth: 6/20   00:00:00  33kN
>3.Qc8 Qe7 4.Re4 Rxe4 5.d8Q Qxd8 6.Qxd8 Re2+ 7.Kg3
>  ±  (1.31)   Depth: 7/19   00:00:00  62kN
>3.Kf2!
>  ±  (1.34)   Depth: 7/19   00:00:00  91kN
>3.Kf2 b3 4.Qc8 Qe7 5.Re4 Rxe4 6.d8Q Re2+ 7.Kg3 Qxd8
>  ±  (1.13)   Depth: 8/19   00:00:00  358kN
>3.Qc8!
>  ±  (1.16)   Depth: 8/19   00:00:00  377kN
>3.Qc8! Qe7 4.Re4 Rxe4 5.d8Q Re2+ 6.Kh3 Qxd8 7.Qxd8
>  ±  (1.22)   Depth: 8/23   00:00:00  408kN
>3.g5!
>  ±  (1.25)   Depth: 8/23   00:00:00  617kN
>3.g5! fxg5 4.Kf2 Rh1 5.Qc8 Qe7 6.Kg2 Qe2+ 7.Kxh1 Qxf3+ 8.Kg1
>  +-  (1.59)   Depth: 8/23   00:00:01  756kN
>3.g5!
>  +-  (1.91)   Depth: 9/24   00:00:01  1383kN
>3.g5! fxg5 4.Kf2 b3 5.Qc3 Re5 6.Rd5 a4
>  +-  (1.94)   Depth: 9/25   00:00:02  1800kN
>3.Rd2!
>  +-  (1.97)   Depth: 9/26   00:00:04  3148kN
>3.Rd2! Qb6 4.d8Q Re2+ 5.Rxe2 Qxd8 6.Kf2
>  +-  (2.34)   Depth: 9/26   00:00:04  3673kN
>3.Rd2!
>  +-  (2.66)   Depth: 10/26   00:00:05  3966kN
>3.Rd2! Qb6 4.d8Q Re2+ 5.Rxe2 Qxd8 6.Qc5 b3 7.Rb2 Qd3 8.Qxa5
>  +-  (3.22)   Depth: 10/27   00:00:05  4322kN
>3.Rd2--
>  +-  (2.91)   Depth: 11/28   00:00:06  5016kN
>3.Rd2-- Qb6 4.d8Q Re2+ 5.Rxe2 Qxd8 6.Qc5 f5 7.Re7+ Kg8 8.gxf5 h5
>  +-  (2.81)   Depth: 11/30   00:00:07  5729kN
>3.Rd2!
>  +-  (3.13)   Depth: 12/29   00:00:11  8724kN
>3.Rd2! Qb6 4.d8Q Re2+ 5.Rxe2 Qxd8 6.Rd2 b3 7.Rxd8 bxc2 8.Rc8 h5
>  +-  (3.28)   Depth: 12/31   00:00:13  10356kN
>3.Rd2 Qb6 4.d8Q Re2+ 5.Rxe2 Qxd8 6.Rd2 Qe8
>  +-  (3.50)   Depth: 13/34   00:00:26  20205kN
>3.Kf2!
>  +-  (3.53)   Depth: 13/34   00:00:50  38339kN
>3.Kf2! b3 4.Qc3 Rh1 5.Qc8 Qe7 6.Qe8 Qe5 7.Qxe5 fxe5 8.d8Q exd4
>  +-  (4.06)   Depth: 13/34   00:01:03  48006kN
>3.Kf2--
>  +-  (3.75)   Depth: 14/35   00:01:17  58842kN
>3.Kf2-- b3 4.Qc3 Re5 5.g5 b2 6.gxf6+ Kf7 7.Qxb2 Ke6 8.f7 Kxf7
>  +-  (1.44)   Depth: 14/36   00:01:52  84634kN
>3.Kg3!
>  +-  (1.47)   Depth: 14/36   00:03:33  160761kN, tb=2
>3.Kg3! Qb8+ 4.f4 Qd8 5.g5 fxg5 6.Kf2 Ra1 7.Qb2 Rh1 8.Rd1+ Kg8
>  +-  (2.06)   Depth: 14/40   00:06:54  312470kN, tb=3
>3.Rd2!
>  +-  (2.09)   Depth: 14/40   00:07:19  330736kN, tb=3
>3.Rd2! Qb6 4.d8Q Re2+ 5.Rxe2 Qxd8 6.Rd2 Qe8
>  +-  (3.63)   Depth: 14/40   00:08:04  363488kN, tb=3

The sequence of scores here is strange, a lot of small fail highs then a large
fail low, then again a build up of small fail highs and a fail low.....

-S.
>(blass, tel-aviv 04.01.2003)
>
>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.