Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 14:45:45 01/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2003 at 17:31:42, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 04, 2003 at 16:49:25, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On January 04, 2003 at 16:42:12, David Rasmussen wrote: >> >>>Is there going to be a paragraph on evaluation on your page, Ed? >>> >>>/David >> >> >>I think that it is better first to fix the misunderstanding about things that >>are done in the search. >> >>It is better to understand one thing than not to understand 2 things. >> >>Uri > >I want to make clear that I do not say that I do not understand nothing of the >search but I believe that the search information is more important and I think >that it is better to have exact explanation of what is done in the search and >not some information about the search and about the evaluation when we do not >understand 100% of it and part of it may be misleading. > >Uri Why are you so glad about all these tricks being exposed anyway? It is only to the advantage of the great programmers, implementation is all that is left when there are no more secrets. It just raises the level so it becomes harder and harder to compete and all programs will converge to the same strength. There is not much sport in that IMO. One of Ed's ideas was already on my todo-list, now it's on everybodys todo list! I'm not sure how I feel about that.... -S.
This page took 0.04 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.