Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A mate in 1 no program (or human) can find.

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 16:11:16 01/04/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 04, 2003 at 18:56:27, Omid David Tabibi wrote:

>[D] 4R3/8/8/8/8/8/8/R3K2k w Q - 0 1
>
>The last two moves were e8=R Kh1.
>
>Now how can white mate in 1? I bet no program can find the mate in one move...
>
>Think for a minute... (answer below)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>O-O-O-O#
>
>[D] 8/8/8/8/8/4K3/4R3/R6k b - - 0 1
>
>According to FIDE rules, this move (long long castle) is perfectly legal.
>
>Let's see the "castling" section (as appearing on Fide Laws of Chess 1997
>http://www.marochess.de/chess/fidelaws):
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>(ii) 'castling'. This is a move of the king and either rook of the same colour^,
>counting as a single move of the king and executed as follows: the king is
>transferred from its original square two squares towards the rook, then that
>rook is transferred over the king to the square the king has just crossed.
>
>    (1) Castling is illegal:
>
>        [a] if the king has already been moved, or
>        [b] with a rook that has already been moved

The rook has already been moved in the time when it was a pawn so castling is
illegal by fide rules.
The rule does not say that the rook has to be a rook at the time that it moved.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.