Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 16:21:31 01/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2003 at 17:45:45, Sune Fischer wrote: >On January 04, 2003 at 17:31:42, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On January 04, 2003 at 16:49:25, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On January 04, 2003 at 16:42:12, David Rasmussen wrote: >>> >>>>Is there going to be a paragraph on evaluation on your page, Ed? >>>> >>>>/David >>> >>> >>>I think that it is better first to fix the misunderstanding about things that >>>are done in the search. >>> >>>It is better to understand one thing than not to understand 2 things. >>> >>>Uri >> >>I want to make clear that I do not say that I do not understand nothing of the >>search but I believe that the search information is more important and I think >>that it is better to have exact explanation of what is done in the search and >>not some information about the search and about the evaluation when we do not >>understand 100% of it and part of it may be misleading. >> >>Uri > >Why are you so glad about all these tricks being exposed anyway? >It is only to the advantage of the great programmers, implementation is all that >is left when there are no more secrets. > >It just raises the level so it becomes harder and harder to compete and all >programs will converge to the same strength. There is not much sport in that >IMO. > >One of Ed's ideas was already on my todo-list, now it's on everybodys todo list! >I'm not sure how I feel about that.... > For each new idea, there are many potential improvements. If Ed has contributed 10 new ideas, now there are tens of potential improvements... >-S.
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.