Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What about evaluation, Ed?

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 16:56:03 01/04/03

On January 04, 2003 at 19:30:48, Omid David Tabibi wrote:

>On January 04, 2003 at 19:25:28, Sune Fischer wrote:
>
>>On January 04, 2003 at 19:21:31, Omid David Tabibi wrote:
>>
>>>For each new idea, there are many potential improvements. If Ed has contributed
>>>10 new ideas, now there are tens of potential improvements...
>>
>>Refinements, not new ideas.
>
>Looking from that perspective, have there been any new ideas ever?! For example,
>MTD(f) is a refinement of NegaScout which is a refinement of PVS which is a
>refinement of AlphaBeta which is a refinement of MinMax which is a refinement
>of....
>
>All refinements, no new ideas!

Yes, but the new ideas get smaller and smaller, convergence is inevitable.
Convergence kills the sport, so let's slow it down a bit :)

-S.

Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Omid David Tabibi 17:01:53 01/04/03
- Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Uri Blass 02:20:44 01/05/03
  - Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Sune Fischer 03:28:00 01/05/03
    - Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Dave Gomboc 03:50:22 01/05/03
      - Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Sune Fischer 03:56:24 01/05/03
        
        Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Dave Gomboc 04:18:00 01/05/03
        
        Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Uri Blass 04:34:53 01/05/03
        
        Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Sune Fischer 04:33:17 01/05/03
        
        Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Dave Gomboc 02:35:04 01/07/03
        
        Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Yen Art Tham 05:17:50 01/05/03
        
        Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Sune Fischer 05:21:37 01/05/03
        
        Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Uri Blass 04:00:41 01/05/03
        
        Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Sune Fischer 04:39:05 01/05/03
        
        Advances in computer chess/science (was What about evaluation, Ed?) Alessandro Damiani 05:34:21 01/05/03
        
        Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Graham Laight 09:49:56 01/06/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Walter Faxon 01:04:39 01/07/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Drexel,Michael 04:56:28 01/07/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Russell Reagan 20:00:40 01/07/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Drexel,Michael 03:42:38 01/08/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Graham Laight 04:23:16 01/08/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Drexel,Michael 04:46:08 01/08/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Russell Reagan 06:08:47 01/09/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Drexel,Michael 15:11:23 01/09/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Graham Laight 07:00:07 01/08/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Drexel,Michael 08:53:35 01/08/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Russell Reagan 06:13:35 01/09/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way - corrected maths Graham Laight 04:32:58 01/08/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Graham Laight 02:51:26 01/07/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Walter Faxon 23:58:07 01/07/03
        
        The Faxon Challenge Graham Laight 02:57:28 01/08/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Walter Faxon 23:52:23 01/08/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Uri Blass 02:28:02 01/08/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Walter Faxon 22:47:57 01/08/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Uri Blass 10:47:04 01/06/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Graham Laight 02:35:44 01/07/03
        
        Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Uri Blass 02:40:21 01/07/03
        
        Re: Advances in computer chess/science (OT) Sune Fischer 05:51:59 01/05/03
        
        Re: Advances in computer chess/science (OT) Uri Blass 06:14:47 01/05/03
        
        Re: Advances in computer chess/science (OT) Alessandro Damiani 06:10:01 01/05/03
        
        Re: Advances in computer chess/science (OT) Sune Fischer 06:19:52 01/05/03
        
        Re: Advances in computer chess/science (OT) Alessandro Damiani 06:42:37 01/05/03
        
        Re: Advances in computer chess/science (OT) Sune Fischer 07:43:54 01/05/03
        
        Re: Advances in computer chess/science (OT) Rafael Andrist 07:57:17 01/05/03
        
        Re: Advances in computer chess/science (OT) Sune Fischer 08:19:38 01/05/03
        
        Re: Advances in computer chess/science (OT) Uri Blass 08:54:42 01/05/03
        
        Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Uri Blass 04:46:50 01/05/03
        
        Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Sune Fischer 04:57:00 01/05/03
        
        Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Uri Blass 05:05:18 01/05/03
        
        Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Sune Fischer 05:16:04 01/05/03
        
        Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Uri Blass 05:25:21 01/05/03
    - Re: What about evaluation, Ed? Uri Blass 03:49:40 01/05/03

This page took 0.07 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.