Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 05:16:04 01/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 05, 2003 at 08:05:18, Uri Blass wrote: >This is dependent in the definition of the goal. >You can also say that the goal is to make your engine stronger when you do not >care about the competition. okay, yes. One could also say that the computer chess community is challenging the human chess community, in that sense sharing is great of course. But not to care about the competition seems a bit strange, chess is a game so without competition where is the fun? >There are a lot of engines when the author publish the source code. > >Resp comes with a source code but I think that a page that explain ideas like >Ed's stuff is more productive for understanding then a new source code because >in a source code I often do not know where to look and it is easy in Ed's page. This is also too generous IMO. >>It is less time consuming for everybody, which means Movei will not progress in >>relative strength, only in absolute strength. > >I do not think so. > >There are engines that the programmers stopped to work about them so it means >that movei may improve more relative to them. Well IMO it's not as fun beating a 3 year old retired engine as one that was released yesterday. -S. >Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.