Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Strength question

Author: Bruce Moreland

Date: 23:02:34 01/05/03

Go up one level in this thread


On January 05, 2003 at 23:21:40, Russell Reagan wrote:

>It's probably best not to, since it is a linear improvement to an exponential
>problem. Where the real improvements in playing strength will come from are
>exponential improvements to the exponential problem (like null-move knocking
>that branching factor down). Of course, I'm sure you already know this, and this
>is your clever way of making others think about it for themselves and discover
>the answer on their own, giving us all a greater sense of accomplishment and
>self worth (not to mention saving us a great deal of time) ;-)

Yes, I agree with this.  The real improvement comes in doing new stuff, not in
making the old stuff a few percent faster.

Which is why I brought this up.  If I could decrease bf by a few percent I'd get
more speedup than I would by performance twiddling for years.

bruce



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.