Author: Mark Young
Date: 21:32:23 01/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 06, 2003 at 14:15:00, Chris wrote: >On January 06, 2003 at 14:06:54, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On January 06, 2003 at 12:45:28, Chris wrote: >> >>>Some people here seems to doubt that it is possible to beat the top engines, but >>>I found out that you can still do it with the normal means of setting up the >>>Stonewall as White. >>> >>>These games was of course played without takeback or other kinds of cheating. >>> >>>My OTB ELO is 2230 and I have studied computer weaknesses a lot. >>> >>>After this game, I lost six in a row, and I decided that maybe I need some more >>>time the next time I challenge Fritz :-) I believe I would have a better chance >>>at tournament speed. >> >>I believe that at tournament speed Fritz8 also can play better. >>It is possible that it will not let you to win by the same strategy and the only >>way to know is to try. >> >>It is a mistake to get a conclusion from speed chess about tournament time >>control games. >> >>Uri > > > >I believe Fritz would be stronger tactically in a longer game, but I don't think >it would change so much strategically. I was getting into this position by >following its book. It looks like Fritz blundered in a better position mostly due to a slow computer. How do you win if Fritz plays 30.. Rg8. This would be played by Fritz 8 on a faster computer. I may be wrong, but I don't see were Fritz was strategically lost. Not until the Blunder Rf7.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.