Author: Chris
Date: 03:33:17 01/07/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2003 at 00:32:23, Mark Young wrote: >On January 06, 2003 at 14:15:00, Chris wrote: > >>On January 06, 2003 at 14:06:54, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On January 06, 2003 at 12:45:28, Chris wrote: >>> >>>>Some people here seems to doubt that it is possible to beat the top engines, but >>>>I found out that you can still do it with the normal means of setting up the >>>>Stonewall as White. >>>> >>>>These games was of course played without takeback or other kinds of cheating. >>>> >>>>My OTB ELO is 2230 and I have studied computer weaknesses a lot. >>>> >>>>After this game, I lost six in a row, and I decided that maybe I need some more >>>>time the next time I challenge Fritz :-) I believe I would have a better chance >>>>at tournament speed. >>> >>>I believe that at tournament speed Fritz8 also can play better. >>>It is possible that it will not let you to win by the same strategy and the only >>>way to know is to try. >>> >>>It is a mistake to get a conclusion from speed chess about tournament time >>>control games. >>> >>>Uri >> >> >> >>I believe Fritz would be stronger tactically in a longer game, but I don't think >>it would change so much strategically. I was getting into this position by >>following its book. > >It looks like Fritz blundered in a better position mostly due to a slow >computer. How do you win if Fritz plays 30.. Rg8. This would be played by Fritz >8 on a faster computer. > >I may be wrong, but I don't see were Fritz was strategically lost. Not until the >Blunder Rf7. The thing is that doesn't sense the dangers of the position which would be there even without Rf7
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.