Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 02:08:04 01/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 08, 2003 at 03:28:26, Steve Maughan wrote: >Ed, > >The 'penny drops'! Seriously good trick! > >So I can see that this is potentially a replacement for SEE (and more). Have >you any idea if it is faster than SEE - what percentage of CPU time is taken up >with this type of board scanning? I never used SEE of course because my own system has it build-in, so I can't tell which system is faster. I do know that all the scanning of the white and black pieces is a most costly business and my best guess is that SEE probably by far is superior regarding speed. But the system isn't only about move-ordering, that is just one of the advantages, its main goal is EVAL. Ed >My gut feel is that it'll probably be a >little slower but contain more knowledge > >Thanks, > >Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.