Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way...

Author: Drexel,Michael

Date: 03:42:38 01/08/03

Go up one level in this thread

On January 07, 2003 at 23:00:40, Russell Reagan wrote:

>On January 07, 2003 at 07:56:28, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>
>>Nonsense. computer chess will improve slower and slower.
>
>>again you are wrong. computer chess will never demonstrate this.
>
>>no computer will EVER be able to prove that. not in 10000 years. a prove would
>>require a 32-piece tablebase. hope you know what that means.
>
>That is quite a bold (and pessimistic) statement. Unfortunately, it's also
>wrong. It is quite foolish to predict what will be possible in 10,000 years IMO.

Sorry, I was wrong. Chess will be solved in year 2168 :-)

http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~kunegis/hack/chess/

do you really know what 10^43 means? I dont think so.

• Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Graham Laight 04:23:16 01/08/03
  • Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Drexel,Michael 04:46:08 01/08/03
    • Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Russell Reagan 06:08:47 01/09/03
      • Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Drexel,Michael 15:11:23 01/09/03
    • Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Graham Laight 07:00:07 01/08/03
      • Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Drexel,Michael 08:53:35 01/08/03
        • Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way... Russell Reagan 06:13:35 01/09/03
  • Re: Computer Chess Went The Wrong Way - corrected maths Graham Laight 04:32:58 01/08/03

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.