Author: Mark Young
Date: 23:13:16 09/22/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 22, 1998 at 23:59:27, Les Walker wrote: >On September 22, 1998 at 21:19:12, James Robertson wrote: > >>On September 22, 1998 at 16:21:40, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>On September 22, 1998 at 15:40:08, James Robertson wrote: >>> >>>>On September 22, 1998 at 14:01:26, Mark Young wrote: >>>> >>>>>Match to be 6 games. >>>>>Played on two P II 333, 128mb ram. >>>>>Chessmaster 6000, (default settings)except for Hash set to 64mb. >>>>>Fritz 5, 80 Mb hash, None default book made from 1,000,000+ master level games. >>>> >>>>Why are hash table sizes uneven? >>> >>>The next size up for Chessmaster 6000 is 128mb of hash. So 64mb is max with 128 >>>megs of ram. > > >I think this is an excellent idea. The games are very close and the extra hash >could make a big difference in the final standings. > Fritz 5 is not filling the hash tabes at g/60 time controls with 80 mb hash. So I know that CM6000 is not even coming close to filling 64mb of hash. So I do not think it would have any effect. >Les W. >> >>Why not reduce Fritz to 64?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.