Author: Brian Kostick
Date: 20:26:58 01/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 08, 2003 at 17:56:03, Christophe Theron wrote: >On January 08, 2003 at 14:27:13, Christopher A. Morgan wrote: > >> >>Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14 >> >>More proof, not that it is needed, that Ruffian 1.0.1 is a very strong engine, >>resulted from 90 blitz games, 5'+10" on Athlon 750, 112 MB hash between Chess >>Tiger 14 and Ruffian 1.0.1. Overall result for 90 games, 45.5 - 44.5 in CT14's >>favor. In decided games 26-25 in CT14's favor. > > > >Playing 5'+10'' is like giving a huge handicap to Tiger because its Fischer time >management does not work properly. > >Play games with no time increment if you want to see the real thing. > > > > Christophe I think Chess Tiger has to suffer any consequence, kind of like Crafty and the no ponder issues. The end-user is just reporting some result. Mostly I'm suprised that you haven't bothered to impliment this time control optimally. I suppose it is at least recovering this time if the Chessbase GUI is maintaining the time controls, even if your engine does not utilize it fully. Best, BK
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.