Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 22:17:24 01/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 08, 2003 at 17:56:03, Christophe Theron wrote: >On January 08, 2003 at 14:27:13, Christopher A. Morgan wrote: > >> >>Ruffian 1.0.1 very strong in blitz games v. Chess Tiger 14 >> >>More proof, not that it is needed, that Ruffian 1.0.1 is a very strong engine, >>resulted from 90 blitz games, 5'+10" on Athlon 750, 112 MB hash between Chess >>Tiger 14 and Ruffian 1.0.1. Overall result for 90 games, 45.5 - 44.5 in CT14's >>favor. In decided games 26-25 in CT14's favor. > > > >Playing 5'+10'' is like giving a huge handicap to Tiger because its Fischer time >management does not work properly. Then Tiger sucks. Aren't you the one that time and time again have stated that an engine that is better at blitz than at standard or vice versa, sucks? Doesn't the same apply here? /David
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.